Document review

See the text that needs attention, together with the reason and proposed approach.

Choose the review approach and party perspective. Consider each finding alongside the relevant clause, your organizational standard, and the proposed assessment—then make the final decision yourself.

Request a demo
Example data
Clause 11.2 · Termination
Review finding

The notice period is below the organizational standard.

Review approach

Set the point of view before the review begins.

The same clause can call for a different assessment depending on your side of the agreement, the type of matter, and your organization’s risk approach. Make that frame visible from the start.

01

Party perspective

Define which party’s position the document is being reviewed from.

02

Review scope

Select the risk and control questions that matter for this review.

03

Organizational standard

Bring your team’s accepted approach into context as a Review Standard.

Clause-linked finding

A finding stays connected to its basis in the document.

In supported review flows, see the finding alongside the relevant clause. Assess the difference from your organizational standard and verify which language the assessment is based on.

Example dataSupply agreement

11.2 · Termination for convenience

The Customer may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 15 days’ prior written notice.

01

Notice period

The 15-day period is shorter than the 30-day position in the selected Review Standard.

Basis
Clause 11.2
Review Standard
At least 30 days’ notice for termination for convenience
Supply agreementExample data
11.2 · Termination for convenience

The Customer may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 15 days’ prior written notice.

Clause 11.2

Notice period

The 15-day period is shorter than the 30-day position in the selected Review Standard.

Basis
Clause 11.2
Review Standard
At least 30 days’ notice for termination for convenience

Compare with your standard

Bring your organization’s approach into the review.

A Review Standard helps your team apply its chosen preferences and assessment framework consistently across similar matters.

Term in the document15 days
Organizational positionAt least 30 days

The difference is presented as an open decision point for the team.

Human decision

The finding provides direction. Your legal team makes the decision.

Harmonity brings the clause and its assessment context together. Accepting, editing, or rejecting a finding remains with the user who considers the commercial circumstances and legal outcome.

  1. 01Read the clause and its basis
  2. 02Assess the difference from your standard
  3. 03Record the decision and team note

Example workflows

Every review preserves the link between text and assessment.

Across different agreements, the point that needs attention, its source clause, and the team assessment stay together in one reading flow.

Example data01

Supply agreement

Clause under review

Fifteen days’ written notice for termination for convenience.

Review finding

The difference from the 30-day position in the selected Review Standard is presented for team decision.

Example data02

Software services agreement

Clause under review

A clause limiting liability to the annual service fees.

Review finding

The scope of the cap and its exceptions are presented alongside the relevant language.

Example data03

Non-disclosure agreement

Clause under review

Confidentiality obligations continuing for two years after the agreement ends.

Review finding

The difference from the organization’s position is shown while staying linked to its source clause.

From one document to a document set

Compare the same question across multiple documents.

Move from clauses and findings in one document to Multi-document Review, where answers to shared questions can be assessed in rows and columns alongside their source passages.

Customer reference

Hear from legal professionals using Harmonity.

It presents risks with its reasoning and also analyzes Word comments. I can respond to clients on the same day.
Nihan ŞefkatlioğluSenior Lawyer, SCH Legal
All customer stories

About document review

Frequently asked questions.

What is selected before a review begins?

You define the document, party perspective, review scope, and Review Standard according to the needs of the matter.

Does a finding amount to a definitive legal opinion?

No. A finding is working support that makes the text requiring attention and its assessment basis visible. The legal team remains responsible for the final assessment.

How can the basis of a finding be inspected?

In supported review flows, you can read the finding alongside the relevant clause, explanation, and selected Review Standard.

Can multiple documents be reviewed against the same questions?

Multi-document Review provides a separate comparison workflow that places documents in rows and shared questions in columns.

Review a contract through your own approach.

Choose a contract and review question, then see how the clause, finding, and organizational standard come together in a live demo.

Request a demo